On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 09:34:07AM +0100, Andreas Krebbel wrote: > Hi Ian, > > have you had time to look at this? Or does anyone else like to > comment? > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2007-10/msg00092.html
I have no opinion on the attribute functions which took an alternative parameter. But the enabled alternative seems like a reasonable addition; ARM has the same problem. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery