On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 18:33:37 +0100, Andrew Haley wrote: > We do understand what you're saying, and simply repeating the same > thing doesn't help. > > I think we should wait to see what the C++ working group comes up with > and consider implementing that, rather than some ad-hoc gcc-specific > proposal.
Aha, but repeating worked. This is the first time someone agrees that the problem lies not entirely in the programmer's code. Thank you! :)) -- Tomash Brechko
