Jie Zhang wrote:
Bernd Schmidt wrote:
Jie Zhang wrote:
Bernd Schmidt wrote:
Jie Zhang wrote:
But by design if gcc_no_link = no, link tests should be avoided.
??? I would have thought gcc_no_link = yes means link tests are
avoided.
Oops, I meant gcc_no_link = yes.
Stupid double negatives. Okay, so then your problem is that
gcc_no_link=yes. Find out why it's setting that.
bfin-elf-gcc -mfdpic failed to link a simple test case because code is
put into L1 instruction sram and data is put into L1 data sram, but
Blackfin immediate offset load instruction cannot access GOT since the
gap between instruction sram and data sram is too large. Using -msim as
default will pass this test case and build gcc without problem but I
would like bfin-elf-gcc target hardware board by default.
Any chance we could target it in such a way as to not put everything in
L1 by default? I think it's stupid to have configure tests failing for
such a reason.
Bernd
--
This footer brought to you by insane German lawmakers.
Analog Devices GmbH Wilhelm-Wagenfeld-Str. 6 80807 Muenchen
Sitz der Gesellschaft Muenchen, Registergericht Muenchen HRB 40368
Geschaeftsfuehrer Thomas Wessel, William A. Martin, Margaret Seif
