On Fri, 31 Aug 2007, Diego Novillo wrote: > > Richard, this comment does not match the code. The code allows type > conversions between two integral types and between arbitrary types that > happen to *not* be integral. Which semantics did you mean here? > > /* Allow conversions between integral types. */ > if (INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (type) == INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (op))) > return false; > > I'm thinking this should be && not ==.
Whoops. Indeed. Now - no guarantee that this won't "break" anything of course... (I'll check on the mainline) Richard.
