On 24 August 2007 17:04, Andrew Pinski wrote: > On 8/24/07, Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Let "a" and "b" be floating-point operands of type F, where F is a >> floating-point type. Let N be the number of bytes in F. Then, "a | b" >> is defined as: > > Yes that makes sense, not. Since most of the time, you have a mask > and that is what is being used.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weasel_word. > Like masking the the sign bit or > doing a selection. The mask is most likely a NaN anyways so having > that undefined just does not make sense. What are you talking about? I can't even parse this rant. cheers, DaveK -- Can't think of a witty .sigline today....
