> That is the point. The FSF, at this time, has said that as of August 1 > all patches are GPLv3.
No, they did not. As far as I know, they said all *releases* are GPLv3. > You want to mix two different things and call them the same. > The only part which matters is the creative changes. Wrong. A patch is a combined work, part a derived work from the file patches and part the creative change. We have to concern ourselves with the intellectual property issues of *both* of those parts.
