Michael Eager <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Unfortunately, as I understand it, this is not the case.  If you
> apply a GPLv3 patch to a previously GPLv2 branch after August 1, then
> this entire branch, and all files in it, magically and silently
> becomes GPLv3.  (This is unless FSF agrees with Mark's proposal
> to dual license patches.)

I hope the COPYING or similar file will contain the licence text
under which the code is distributed?
-- 
Krzysztof Halasa

Reply via email to