Michael Eager <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Unfortunately, as I understand it, this is not the case. If you > apply a GPLv3 patch to a previously GPLv2 branch after August 1, then > this entire branch, and all files in it, magically and silently > becomes GPLv3. (This is unless FSF agrees with Mark's proposal > to dual license patches.)
I hope the COPYING or similar file will contain the licence text under which the code is distributed? -- Krzysztof Halasa
