On 12 July 2007 17:59, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> If you want to release gcc 4.2.2, and then release gcc 4.3.0 from the
> gcc 4.2 branch, and make mainline gcc the eventual gcc 4.4.0, I'm on
> board with that. That is easy enough to understand and not too
> difficult to implement. What I'm disagreeing with is moving from gcc
> 4.2.2 to gcc 4.3.3.
I agree with this sentiment. Go from 4.2.2->4.3.3 with no 4.3.{0-2}?
That's just incoherent.
cheers,
DaveK
--
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....
