David Edelsohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | >>>>> Doug Gregor writes: | | Doug> Could we ask the SC to reconsider the change in the GCC major version | Doug> numbering for GPLv3? Or, at the very least, explain why it is | Doug> important to change the major version number for a mere license | Doug> change? | | To avoid confusion among GCC users who do not expect a bug fix | release to introuduce a new license.
then, let's close the tree. It is far less confusing than the proposed renaming scheme. -- Gaby
