On Sat, 7 Jul 2007, Kaveh R. GHAZI wrote: > Ok, how about e.g. __attribute__ ((__type_generic__)), which would only be > allowed on variadic functions?
I don't think we want this available to user code, just to builtins, so a name such as "type generic" that can't be used as an identifier would be better (see "no vops" for an existing example). -- Joseph S. Myers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
