On Friday 29 June 2007 17:31:17 pm Lawrence Crowl wrote: > I've sent your question to the C++ committee, as I wasn't > sure of the answer.
It's been pointed out to me, after I asked this, that the example code from the second bullet under C++ for the gcc-4.2 changes document is almost identical, and the general description seems to indicate this change was intentional. -- Daniel Schepler
