On Friday 29 June 2007 17:31:17 pm Lawrence Crowl wrote:
> I've sent your question to the C++ committee, as I wasn't
> sure of the answer.

It's been pointed out to me, after I asked this, that the example code from 
the second bullet under C++ for the gcc-4.2 changes document is almost 
identical, and the general description seems to indicate this change was 
intentional.
-- 
Daniel Schepler

Reply via email to