Rask Ingemann Lambertsen wrote: > On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 11:36:00PM -0400, Kenneth Zadeck wrote: > >>> Try: >>> >>> df_note_add_problem (); >>> df_analyze (); >>> -- >>> #pragma ident "Seongbae Park, compiler, http://seongbae.blogspot.com" >>> >> What Seongbae said is correct. However, what Seongbae failed to say is >> that you can ditch the code that gets rid of the old notes. That will >> be done by the note problem. >> > > Yes, look at what I posted yesterday already and smile. > <URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-06/msg01147.html> > > I thought of one more thing over night: after the call to df_analyze, you need to add a call to "df_remove_problem (df_note);" Otherwise, the next call to df_analyze will also rebuild the notes. The other possibility is to call "df_finish_pass ()" which will have the same effect.
Sorry for not thinking about this sooner. kenny