"Richard Guenther" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It was a patch to enable more optimization. Reverting it should be as safe > or unsafe as exchanging forwprop and dce passes. And I have no idea > as how to quantify safeness of either ;) > > I'd say we better analyze what goes wrong (as the problem is possibly > latent on the mainline) and fix it properly. If we paper over it we will not > fix it at all. >
I vote for reverting that change (r111639) on the branch before release. We would gain nothing by having bug 30252, however latent, uncovered in a released compiler.
