Joe Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't even think this qualifies as a bug. It's basically an > enhancement request, to have a clean way of supporting glibc in > an unusual place.
It works in previous versions going back to 2.95.3, so I'd think it would be a bug, and a regression. But since this is such a rare circumstance, I wouldn't expect it to be a release-blocker. I brought it up only in the hope that it might be transparent to someone and fixed before the release, but I certainly understand if it isn't. paul
