On 5/5/07, Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/5/07, Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Richard Guenther wrote:
>
> >> > Another problem is that --enable-checking hasn't been set to 'release',
> >> > so the stage1 binary is too big to run on my ARM systems (and the
> >> > compiler will be unnecessarily slower than it needs to be).
>
> >> Are you sure that we're not building with release-checking only?
> >
> > stage1 is always built with checking enabled.
>
> OK. There's a good chance that both Richard E. and I didn't realize
> that (it didn't use to be true). So, from what you're saying, there
> doesn't seem to be an evidence that this is a real problem.
>
> Do we build stage1 with checking enabled even if --disable-checking is
> in effect? Otherwise, how to do folks like Richard E. that are running
> natively on small systems work around this issue?
Specifying --disable-stage1-checking should work. (it's in the toplevel
configure)
I see this is not documented, though :/ Richard, can you check if it actually
works?
Thanks,
Richard.
