As Steven Bosscher wrote: > >The idea behind that tool is great, I only wish the authors had > >taken a class in portable shell scripting before. It's not that > >all the world's a Vax these days...
> Patches welcome, I guess. Well, quite an amount of work, alas. There's no central template in CSiBE where this could be changed, instead, they apparently manually changed each and any of the Makefiles etc. in the src/ subdirectories there, so it's almost 50 files to make identical changes to. I intended to spend my time into trying the various possible GCC configurations (including the really promising idea Richard Guenther proposed), not into patching the benchmark tool. It's not that I'm a university student anymore that has almost indefinate time at hands to spend... That's been 20 years ago. Another thing is to extend CSiBE so it could be used to compile some meaningful AVR code. It's not that I'm lacking that kind of code, but these manually hacked Makefiles for each tool make it kinda difficult to adapt the benchmark suite to different sources that are more appropriate to the AVR. -- cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
