[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ross Ridge) writes: [...]
| Gabriel Dos Reis writes: | >I believe you're confused about the semantics. | >The issue here is that the *size of object* requested can be | >represented. That is independent of whether the machine has enough | >memory or not. So, new_handler is a red herring | | The issue is what GCC should do when the calculation of the size of | memory to allocate with operator new() results in unsigned wrapping. | Currently, GCC's behavior is standard conforming but probably isn't the | expected result. I don't understand this. -- Gaby
