"Dave Korn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > To allow for non gcc compilers, I think I should in fact say > > #if defined(__GNUC__) && !defined(__GNUC_STDC_INLINE__) > #define ELIDABLE_INLINE extern inline > #else > #define ELIDABLE_INLINE inline > #endif > > ... i.e., if using gcc without the new behaviour, use the old 'extern inline' > definition, otherwise we're either not using gcc or using gcc with the new > behaviour, so just use 'inline', which will work if we're gcc, and is just > the-best-we-can-do-and-hope-it-works for non-gcc compilers (to which 'extern > inline' means either nothing at all, or means "emit the function body as per > c99". Does that look sensible to you?
Yes, good point. Ian
