Kai Tietz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > while porting gcc to the new target x86_64-pc-mingw32 I noticed, that on > many places the long type is wrongly used as equivalent for pointers. This > leads for this MS compatible target to some problems, because the long is > just 4 bytes long and the pointer 8 bytes. I found this problems until now > in libc++, libiberty. There are ISO types defined for this case, as > intptr_t and uintptr_t. Is there something defined in the coding style ?
Code in gcc which assumes that sizeof (long) == sizeof (void *) is broken. Tell us where that code is, and we will try to fix it. Ian
