"Manuel López-Ibáñez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On 06/03/07, Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | > Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote: | > > On 05/03/07, Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | > >> After reviewing all of the traffic[1] that stemmed from my previous | > >> status report, I've decided that, indeed, it makes sense to steam ahead | > >> with GCC 4.2.0 based on current GCC 4.2.0 release branch. | > >> | > > | > > I ask special permission to apply this patch: | > > | > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-02/msg01461.html | > > | > > to GCC 4.2.0. This patch is trivial and it has been in GCC 4.3 for a | > > few weeks already. | > | > This patch is OK for 4.2.0, on the grounds that the -Walways-true option | > has not yet appeared in any FSF release, and we don't want to release | > the option with semantics different than what are eventually intended. | > | > Thanks, | > | | As far as I know, it was introduced in GCC 4.2 revision 108489. | | Also: | | $ svn log svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcc-4_2-branch | grep -n | -e "Walways.true" | 63424: * gcc.dg/20031012-1.c: Add -Walways-true option. | 63978: * doc/invoke.texi (Warning Options): Document -Walways-true being | 64532: * common.opt (Walways-true): New option. | | while | | $ svn log svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcc-4_1-branch | grep -n | -e "Walways.true" | | shows nothing.
I strongly encourage the removal brefore 4.2 gets out. -- Gaby
