On 2/27/07, Kai Tietz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thank you,
I allready adjusted my code. But by the reason of the need to define
OUTGOING_REG_PARM_STACK_SPACE for this target, I had to change the general
definition of it to be target specific.
This is why the uses of OUTGOING_REG_PARM_STACK_SPACE should really be
changed to be if(OUTGOING_REG_PARM_STACK_SPACE) instead of #ifdef
OUTGOING_REG_PARM_STACK_SPACE.
There was an email a while back from Zack Weinberg and Hans-Peter
Nilsson which talks explictly about how chaning this has saved
maintaining and finding bugs in the compiler.
<http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2001-01/msg01775.html and
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2001-01/msg01777.html>
And I thought this was really part of our coding style too but I
cannot find it on http://gcc.gnu.org/codingconventions.html .
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski
