--- Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't actually understand the question. gcc is compiling the > function as you wrote it. What do you want it to do differently?
This has been resolved today by: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30785 I was adding code to test a pointer to zero in this function and there was never influence in the assembler of the function, I though there was some trick to auto-insert the library function. I am sorry to not have recognise that there was no loops in: strncpy: stwu 1,-32(1) stw 31,28(1) mr 31,1 stw 3,8(31) stw 4,12(31) stw 5,16(31) lwz 0,8(31) mr 3,0 lwz 11,0(1) lwz 31,-4(11) mr 1,11 blr so this is the unoptimised "do nothing" function with 3 parameters. Sorry again, Etienne. ___________________________________________________________________________ Découvrez une nouvelle façon d'obtenir des réponses à toutes vos questions ! Profitez des connaissances, des opinions et des expériences des internautes sur Yahoo! Questions/Réponses http://fr.answers.yahoo.com
