Benjamin Kosnik writes: > > I am somewhat concerned with the response of the java maintainers > (and others) that it's OK to require >512MB to bootstrap gcc with > java, or that make times "WORKSFORME."
Well, I didn't say that, so I hope you aren't referring to me. But before we do anything we need to know more about the machine on which it failed. Ultimately, it's a question of what we consider to be a reasonable machine on which to build libgcj. I don't know the answer to that. Andrew.
