Robert Schwebel wrote: > What about PR28516, would it be acceptable for 4.1.2?
There are two issues: (1) it's not marked as a 4.1 regression, let alone a regression from 4.1.x. Did this test case work with older versions of GCC? (2) Richard Earnshaw objected to applying the patch to 4.1 because it requires a newer GAS. Paul's counter that the newer GAS is only needed if your compiler would otherwise crash seems persuasive to me, if true, but I'd certainly want Richard to be comfortable with the change. Thanks, -- Mark Mitchell CodeSourcery [EMAIL PROTECTED] (650) 331-3385 x713
