"Manuel López-Ibáñez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On 23/01/07, Joe Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | > On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 07:52:30PM +0000, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote: | > > * A base class is not initialized in a derived class' copy constructor. | > > | > > Proposed: move this warning to -Wuninitialized seems the appropriate | > > solution. However, I am afraid that this warning will turn out to be | > > too noisy and hard to avoid to be in Wuninitialized (see PR 11159). | > > Perhaps a new option -Wuninitialized-base-class enabled by -Wextra | > > would be better if that PR cannot be easily fixed. | > | > Yuck. Until PR 11159 is fixed, we can't move that warning into anything | > that is enabled by -Wall. | | Agreed. And what about the name, -Wuninitialized-base-class? Is it fitting?
Or fix PR 11159. -- Gaby
