Well, you are right. The code looks good and works also. But I have some kind of a reference implementation which is based on GCC 2.7.2.3. In this version the local variables are allocated the other way around, the way in which I expected. Obviously, the order of allocation has changed till now (4.1.1). I just wanted to know whether I can correct this, but if not its also OK.
Thanks, Markus Robert Dewar wrote: > Markus Franke wrote: > >> Please let me know whether I missunderstood something completely. If >> this behaviour is correct what can I do to change it to the other way >> around. Which macro variable do I have to change? > > > There is no legitimate reason to care about the order of variables > in the local stack frame! Or at least I don't see one, why do *you* > care? Generally one may want to reorder the variables for alignment > purposes anyway. > -- Nichts ist so praktisch wie eine gute Theorie!
