On 18 Jan 2007 10:19:37 -0600, Gabriel Dos Reis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Paolo Carlini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Richard Guenther wrote:
|
| > Providing a __builtin_assert () function is still one thing on my
| > TODO, we can
| > derive proper ASSERT_EXPRs from it in VRP even in the -DNDEBUG case.
|
| Great! Certainly could be profitably used in libstdc++.
Indeed!
We would just make sure that people don't think there is a relation
between __builtin_assert() and assert(), and there usually are
between __builtin_xxx() and xxx().
Ok, so better name it __builtin_assume () then.
Richard.
