On Jan 13, 2007, at 6:13 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
Do the Darwin gcc developers ever intend to replicate the use of fat binaries for FSF gcc (in gcc 4.3 perhaps) or will we always use separate subdirectories for 32-bit and 64-bit shared libraries?
I'd be curious to hear what people might say, pro or con about this... I'm not wedded to either approach. I do know if mpfr and gmp built fat and installed that way, that I wouldn't have to configure with the, please select the 32 bit abi option. :-(
