On 13 January 2007 14:00, Dave Korn wrote:

> On 13 January 2007 12:55, Rask Ingemann Lambertsen wrote:
> 

>> 
>> if (func)
>>   {
>>     ...
>>   }
>> 
>> it'll be bad to warn about
>> 
>> if (timerstruct->callbackfunc)
>>   {
>>     ...
>>     timerstruct->callbackfunc (...);
>>     ...
>>   }
>> 
> 
>   And equally bad to warn about
> 
>> if (func)
>>   {
>>     ...
>       func (...);
>>     ...
>>   }


  Nope, hang on.. that first 'func' is an explicit function name, the second
two cases are meant to be variables...  I don't see why it should be any
problem to only warn for explicit function names.


    cheers,
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....

Reply via email to