"Manuel López-Ibáñez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...]
| > I assume the -Wno-xxx that are set by default would be moved to the | > "default" section? | > | | No. Why? | Warnings that are not active by default are obviously disabled, | there is no need to mention them. I don't understand. Please explain further. [...] | > | -pedantic <-- -pedantic-errors | > | > -ansi (and corresponding -std= options) also implies pedwarns or | > errors but not all. | > Moreoverm, g++ -fpermissive issues warnings where it should be | > issueing hard errors. | > | | Why pedantic issues warnings in C and errors in C++ Please, consult the archive; we have been through that many times. [...] | > | -Winit-self <== -Wuninitialized # depends not only on -O1, but -O(1|2|3|s) | > | > I believe the correct understanding is that it depends on optimization | > level different from -O0. | > | | It seems to me that the only reason for Winit-self to exists is that | people try to silence the -Wuninitialized warnings using the init-self | hack and then other people have to work-around that hack. I don't believe that explanation. -- Gaby
