On Mon, 2007-01-08 at 18:25 -0800, H. J. Lu wrote:
> I am enclosing a patch to implement a new linker swicth,
> --dynamic-list-data. It is -Bsymbolic for function symbols only.
> I tried it with C, C++, Java and Fortran on Linux/ia32, Linux/x86-64
> and Linux/ia64. There are only a few regressions. The function calls
> within the new resulting DSOs will bind locally. It speeds up
> the enclosed C++ testcase by
> 
> 1. 23% on ia64.
> 2. 6% on ia32.
> 3. 3% on x86-64.
> 
> Should we consider such optimization?

The real question is, does this work with operator new?

In that if I a C++ developer provides a seperate operator new (and
delete), does libstdc++ use that one as required by the C++ standard?

Thanks,
Andrew Pinski

Reply via email to