On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 06:00:53PM +0100, Eric Botcazou wrote: > So, assuming we go back to the old behaviour, 4.2.x would be the only series > for which 'make' performs a complete bootstrap? Seems a little odd. I think > we need a clear cut here: either automatic bootstrap is a good feature and > we're done, or it (after all) isn't and no series of compilers should be > released with it.
Someone else gets to make that decision then. I'm somewhat sorry for raising the issue; I took another look at it last night, and it would be harder than I thought to get it working. And I certainly don't have time to do it before 4.2.0. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery
