On 1/5/07, David Edelsohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>> Steven Bosscher writes:

Steven> What does the code look like if you compile with -O2  -fgcse-sm?

        Yep.  Mark and I recently discussed whether gcse-sm should be
enabled by default at some optimization level.  We're hiding performance
from GCC users.

The problem with it used to be that it was just very broken. When I
fixed PR24257, it was still not possible to bootstrap with gcse store
motion enabled.

Putting someone on fixing tree load&store motion is probably more
useful anyway, if you're going to do load&store motion for
performance.  In RTL, we can't move loads and stores that are not
simple loads or stores (i.e. reg <- mem, or mem <- reg). There are two
very popular targets where this is the common case ;-)

Gr.
Steven

Reply via email to