On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 08:24:35PM -0000, Dave Korn wrote: > On 03 January 2007 19:08, Adam Sulmicki wrote: > > > On Wed, 3 Jan 2007, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > > > >> I told you was to use the gcc-help mailing list, which was correct. > > > >> So this seems to be a bug in gcc: it should be calling _mcount. > > > > It just that it is my impression that gcc list is more > > appropriate for gcc bugs than gcc-help. > > > Is that your idea of an apology? Regardless of topicality there's no > reasonable reading of Ian's words as a flame, they were entirely polite and > well-measured, and you should withdraw your baseless accusation and say sorry > rather than trying to rationalise it.
Let's try to avoid a fight. For future reference, if you are a gcc user and find unusual behavior that you suspect is a bug, we ask that you go to gcc-help first. Think of it as the first line of support. The next step would be either to go straight to bugzilla (if it's a clear bug with a testcase) or the discussion can move to gcc if it's a tricky issue. The reason things are done this way is that the gcc list already has too much traffic and it's used as the main means of communication between the developers.
