[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richard Kenner) writes: [...]
| > but from other evidence it's clear that common traditional practice assumes | > wrapv semantics. | | "Common traditional C" was actually yet another language that was even more | ill-defined because it included such things as structure assignment that | weren't in K&Rv1. Indeed. Dennis Ritchie is said to have a sticker on this terminal where "Classic C" refers to "K&R C + structure assigments, enumerations and void"[1]. [1] http://www.research.att.com/~bs/siblings_short.pdf -- Gaby
