> which clearly says LIA-1 isn't a requirement - notice "if" in the > second setence. > H.1 makes it clear that the entire Annex H doesn't add any extra rule > to the language but merely describes what C is in regard to LIA-1. > H.2 doubly makes it clear that C as it defined isn't LIA-1 > - again, notice "if" in H.2p1.
That's the way I read it too. Indeed, perhaps -fwrapv really ought to be called -flia-1?
