On Thu, 2006-12-21 at 10:58 -0800, Robert Kennedy wrote: > > Right now we can have SSA_NAMEs in the > > list which are no longer used, and we have no way to tell whether they > > are used or not. Thus the only way to see all valid SSA_NAMEs is to > > walk the code. > > To wit: are there iteration macros somewhere that will help me walk > the code while abstracting away all the ugly details like stmt/bb > boundaries, etc.? Not really. Note that based on the ongoing discussion any such code would have a short life since it sounds like the general direction is to fix this long standing issue. jeff
- Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo? Robert Kennedy
- Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limb... Diego Novillo
- Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limb... Robert Kennedy
- Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limb... Jeffrey Law
- Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free ... Diego Novillo
- Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limb... Jeffrey Law
- Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free ... Zdenek Dvorak
- Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-f... Zdenek Dvorak
- Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, ... Jeffrey Law
- Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limb... Jeffrey Law
- Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limb... Jeffrey Law