On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 13:49 -0500, Daniel Berlin wrote: > On 12/1/06, Andrew MacLeod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > My bootstrap/make check cycle took about 10 hours with yesterdays > > checkout (way longer than expected). A quick investigation shows C++ > > compilation timed are through the roof. > > 10 hours?
read carefully. "bootstrap/make check" > > > > > Using quick (in theory) and trusty cpgram.ii, I get: > > > > tree PTA :1135.48 (88%) usr 5.47 (55%) sys1168.23 (85%) wall > > 4045 kB ( 1%) ggc > > TOTAL :1283.62 9.97 1381.98 > > 451745 kB > > This is uh, like 20 minutes wall time. > So where is 10 hours coming from? this says cpgram.ii, not bootstrap/make check cycle. Big difference. > > > > > > > Is this new code, or is this the old issue we had a few weeks ago? I > > lost track. > > Same issue. > > Still working on it. > The patch i posted to you ended up having a bunch of underlying issues > that needed solving, so it's taking longer than expected. > S'OK. like I said, I wasn't paying close attention and didnt know if you had checked anything in or not. I was under the impression you had, so wanted to make sure we weren't seeing a regression > I'm down to 1 testsuite failure > I'm happy to commit what i have now and fix that one testsuite failure > in a followup if that is what we want. Well, I dont feel strongly one way or the other, I just want to make sure it addressed :-) Andrew
