On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 06:43:46AM -0800, H. J. Lu wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 03:36:59AM -0600, Ryan Hill wrote:
> > Currently, the way the native CPU detection code in driver-i386.c
> > is set up, using -m{arch,tune}=native with an Intel Core Duo (*not
> > Core 2 Duo*) processor will result in -m{arch,tune}=prescott. Is this
> > the correct setting for this chip? There seems to be a lot of confusion
> > across the net as to whether a Core Duo (aka Yonah, aka Centrino Duo)
> > should be using -march=prescott or -march=pentium-m. Some argue
> > that because Core chips share a lot more in common with with the P6
> > microarchitecture than with Netburst, -march=pentium-m should be the
> > correct choice. Others (myself included) point out that just because
> > the design is based on the Pentium M doesn't make it a Pentium M. One
> > major argument supporting -march=prescott is that using
> > -march=pentium-m will greatly prefer using x87 over SSE scalar code,
> > since the Pentium M sucked at SSE (~30% slower than x87 according to
> > Intel's Optimization Manual). Since then, things like improved
> > decoding and micro-op fusion have made SSE a definite win on Netburst
> > and Core CPUs. Some have come to the conclusion that
> > -march=pentium-m -mfpmath=sse -msse3 is the best solution.
> >
> > So anyways, should -m{arch,tune}=native be setting pentium-m for Core
> > CPU's, or is prescott really the better choice in the end?
>
> It should be -march=prescott -mtune=generic. I will look into it.
I opened
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30040
H.J.
