On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 12:03:39PM -0800, H. J. Lu wrote: > On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 11:56:01AM -0800, Brooks Moses wrote: > > H. J. Lu wrote: > > >On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 09:17:49AM -0800, H. J. Lu wrote: > > >>On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 09:43:20AM -0500, David Edelsohn wrote: > > >>> No failure should be expected. It is a bug and a regression and > > >>>should be fixed, with help of users who have access to SPEC CPU2000. > > >>> > > >>It was a pilot error for SPEC CPU2000 on Linux/x86-64. I am looking > > >>into SPEC CPU 2006 failure on Linux/x86. > > > > > >revision 118764 seems with SPEC CPU 2K/2006 on both Linux/x86-64 and > > >Linux/x86. > > > > Was there an "okay" missing from that sentence, or is there still a problem? > > > > Ooops, revision 118764 seems OK. I am verifying it now.
I was wrong. revision 118764 with -O2 still leads to segfault in wrf in SPEC CPU 2006 on Linux/x86. revision 118353 is OK. Linux/x86-64 is OK. I am looking into it now. H.J.
