On 11/5/06, Kenneth Zadeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I would like to point out that the central point of my proposal was to have the compilation manager be the process that manages if an optimization is skipped or not rather than having each pass make a decision on it's own. If we have a central mechanism, then it is relative easy to find some sweet spots. If every pass rolls its own, it is more difficult to balance.
Hmm, I don't understand this. Why is it harder to find a sweet spot if every pass decides for itself whether to run or not? I would think that this decision should be made by each pass individually, because the pass manager is one abstraction level higher where it shouldn't have to know the behavior of each pass. Gr. Steven
