The original author of this patch said he sent his copyright assignment. I
only did minor modification to his work so I don't I think I should send
it too.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-10/msg00833.html
I already did a bootstrap and check to be sure it worked right when I
first sent my modifications. But now I did it against current head and I
get this:
# diff summary-log-normal summary-log-patched
108,110d107
< FAIL: PR27908 execution - source compiled test
< FAIL: PR27908 -O3 execution - bytecode->native test
< FAIL: SyncTest execution - gij test
114,115c111
< # of expected passes 7000
< # of unexpected failures 3
---
# of expected passes 7006
117c113
< # of untested testcases 11
---
# of untested testcases 8
# diff summary-log-normal2 summary-log-patched
100d99
< FAIL: libgomp.fortran/omp_parse3.f90 -O0 execution test
104,105c103
< # of expected passes 1543
< # of unexpected failures 1
---
# of expected passes 1544
110,111d107
< FAIL: SyncTest execution - gij test
< FAIL: SyncTest execution - gij test
115,116c111
< # of expected passes 7002
< # of unexpected failures 2
---
# of expected passes 7006
118c113
< # of untested testcases 10
---
# of untested testcases 8
Results are better with this patch, but I dont think the improving its
related.
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006, DJ Delorie wrote:
Could this patch be applied now?
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2006-07/msg00210.html
Assuming it's been bootstrapped with no regressions, and the legal
paperwork is in place, yes.
