Roger Sayle wrote:
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006, David Daney wrote:
The patch is fully tested and ready to go for the 4.2 branch.
The last thing I want is for this fix to get delayed whilst we argue
over patch testing/approval policy. This fix addresses the known
wrong-code issue, and at worst may replace it with missed optimization
opportunity. Hence although we don't know for sure whether this is
better than reverting the patch that caused the regression, it's
certainly better than where 4.2 is now, and keeps us sync'd with
mainline.
Ok for the 4.2 branch.
Sorry for the confusion. Hopefully, there'll be no more surprises.
For better or worse I just committed this patch to the gcc-4_2-branch.
David Daney
