> > On 10/25/06, Steven Bosscher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > You could use TREE_USED, but your suggestion implies that dead code > > should be retained in the program, > > May be I misunderstood, but it is not dead code. Here is what Zdenek said,
The question now has come to the following point: Do we want to explict in the IR or have a side table which we use to mark the SSA_NAME as still useful. They both have pros and cons. But I say we want to be as explict in the IR as possible. Thanks, Andrew Pinski PS sorry about my return email address, the machine which I use elm from had crashed and then they cloned it and did not fix up the email address issue.
