On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 08:30:46AM -0400, Richard Kenner wrote: > > Regardless of what happens with 4.3, I think the reality is that s/390 > > has been one of the better supported platforms for gcc since at least > > 3.2.x. The maintainers are very responsive and gcc-testresults is > > updated on a daily basis for multiple machine configs (390, 390x). > > I agree. And would consider that an important criteria in the decision about > whether a platform should be a primary or secondary target.
All that is required of a secondary target is that it bootstraps, builds the libraries, and passes most of the tests. It seems clear that s/390 qualifies.
