On Thu, 28 Sep 2006, Joe Buck wrote: > Is this supposed to be for gcc/binutils, or is it supposed to be > processor-independent? And why a closed list? Please don't go > down the path of re-creating what we rebelled against when we started > egcs. Also, if there's a need to crosspost a message betwen your > new list and a gcc or binutils list, the message will bounce. > > If it is for the free toolchain, and you really feel that a new > list is needed because it crosses gcc/binutils boundaries, a new > list hosted off of gcc.gnu.org would be better than a list that > is polluted with Yahoo's ads.
I agree that it should be an open list (or maybe separate ones for the psABIs alongside that for the gABI). I would have suggest having it on lists.freestandards.org alongside DWARF. -- Joseph S. Myers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
