On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 10:45:38AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > > 2) Why does the linker silently resolve the (32-bit PC-relative) > relocation targeting an undefined weak symbol, yielding at > run-time a non-zero address? While I can see the point of
Do you have a testcase? I can't reproduce it. If it is true, I consider it a linker bug. H.J.
