Hello, > Sebastian Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 26/09/2006 21:24:18: > > > It is probably better to include the loop indexes in the example, and > > modify the syntax of the scev for making it more explicit, like: > > > > @smallexample > > for1 i > > for2 j > > *((int *)p + i + j) = a[i][j]; > > @end smallexample > > > > and the access function becomes: @[EMAIL PROTECTED], + [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Done. > > I guess, I'll commit my part as soon as loop.texi (and Dependency analysis > part) > is committed.
I have commited the documentation, including the parts from Daniel and Sebastian (but not yours) now. Zdenek
