"Kate Minola" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > For both lists of libraries, the directories exist. So I don't understand > your answer.
In that case, I don't understand either. It does work as expected for me. I should note that there is one general exception: /lib and /usr/lib will not be passed as -L options, on the assumption that the linker will search them anyhow. Note that a/b/c/../../../x will only exist if a/b/c exists. Ian > On 11 Sep 2006 13:21:12 -0700, Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > "Kate Minola" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > I guess I would have expected that the two lists of libraries would be the > > same, > > > or perhaps that the second list would be contained in the first. But > > > this does not > > > seem to be the case. > > > > > > What am I missing? > > > > gcc only generates a -L option for directories which actually exist, > > and which actually are directories. > > > > Ian > >
