On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 07:39:04PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > Yes, this is the convention we use. > > Void isn't a base type. The DWARF 3 standard way to represent this is > DW_TAG_unspecified_type.
OK, thanks! Ron
On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 07:39:04PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > Yes, this is the convention we use. > > Void isn't a base type. The DWARF 3 standard way to represent this is > DW_TAG_unspecified_type.
OK, thanks! Ron